We all known people who enervated by reputation, even before they have encountered, the Heartbeats Xavier Dolan is a movie of this sort-there: interviews, reviews, posters, "hearsay" and trailer we almost discouraged to go there because it was so obvious that we would go. It is a film that even in his approach annoying, you can take it as you want but a boy of twenty years teaches us that acting suddenly, create, is the real intelligence. It's one of those movies-events in that criticism, or rather the opinions of people taken into account factors that should not be included in a critical position in first: age and insulting arrogance of its director, juxtaposed with old arguments jaded moviegoers and / or frustrated. A viewer comes warned about what he has to provide before their eyes, the trailer extremely aesthetic saying a lot, the campaign poster of great beauty too. In short, even before seeing the movie we were attacked by this strange and disturbing to be in contact with an unidentified work, escaping a pack of labels meant to make this movie awesome, harmless "hype" but more than that, "a film by bobos" but more than that yet.
Looking the Heartbeats we come into contact with a film of beauty outrageous, almost too easy as it convenes cinematic effects just because coarse than effective and that nobody is fooled: idle, adding an outdoor music to the stage, the obsessive work on color, contrasts, harmonies.
Looking the Heartbeats we come into contact with a film of beauty outrageous, almost too easy as it convenes cinematic effects just because coarse than effective and that nobody is fooled: idle, adding an outdoor music to the stage, the obsessive work on color, contrasts, harmonies.
I asked myself the question: why the Heartbeats does not irritate me, I do not clench as he should have done and as happens to do a film which always goes hand in hand with a discourse on Youth as autistic in Life Ranch ? I'll try to respond reasoned and orderly manner.
Heartbeats is a speech that rightly or wrongly believed to be the portrait of its director, few people seem to distinguish the movie rights, not including the film beyond the pettiness and arrogance that would lend him. So making words can be too clean, too studious, and can be considered as Xavier Dolan is too meticulous, that desire to occupy the entire space hysterically film allocated to tickle from around the viewer. Its aesthetic mastery there is never any doubt about the form might have taken this decision words then we sometimes prefer that Christophe Honore makes novels rather than movies, Dolan knows too well what can be done with film. Very lucid and very excited about its release, it acts as a master almighty beating the soundtrack, costumes, dialogues, as one would a failure to put everything in a first novel is also what 'he complains. To this I answer that at no time does the performance away from the connection, at no time in history becomes an excuse, at no time did filming looks. There is no contemplation imposed but rather short sequences, understanding that does not mark the length, but always fleeting. It is in this rapid succession may be influenced less worthy than those admitted, as the aesthetics of the music video for his generation directly, which is an art that has its autonomy and its qualities. On the other hand, although there is a film that such omnipotence is possible about a subject dominated the powerlessness, delusion, disgust and other self-contempt. The splendor of form is adorned misery proved the point.
Heartbeats is a speech that rightly or wrongly believed to be the portrait of its director, few people seem to distinguish the movie rights, not including the film beyond the pettiness and arrogance that would lend him. So making words can be too clean, too studious, and can be considered as Xavier Dolan is too meticulous, that desire to occupy the entire space hysterically film allocated to tickle from around the viewer. Its aesthetic mastery there is never any doubt about the form might have taken this decision words then we sometimes prefer that Christophe Honore makes novels rather than movies, Dolan knows too well what can be done with film. Very lucid and very excited about its release, it acts as a master almighty beating the soundtrack, costumes, dialogues, as one would a failure to put everything in a first novel is also what 'he complains. To this I answer that at no time does the performance away from the connection, at no time in history becomes an excuse, at no time did filming looks. There is no contemplation imposed but rather short sequences, understanding that does not mark the length, but always fleeting. It is in this rapid succession may be influenced less worthy than those admitted, as the aesthetics of the music video for his generation directly, which is an art that has its autonomy and its qualities. On the other hand, although there is a film that such omnipotence is possible about a subject dominated the powerlessness, delusion, disgust and other self-contempt. The splendor of form is adorned misery proved the point.
is another control on Life at the ranch, the film means to approach a realistic effect to feign impotence, but not abandoned heroic assumed, pajamas smell: the camera is there or not it would have been the same. Return to primary excitements about art: "oh how it's like," both sides of the same emptiness. Well sometimes we prefer that the camera is not there, as filmmakers who bow before the real gross rather make their work of selection and ordering of reality: what deserves to be shown or hidden? Rather than admiring fascination with the extreme vacuum fictional correspondence with the real vacuum. "It's too it" could be the title of Life at the ranch, film was never light a camera and see what happens, or give that impression there, we know that artifice in no way compromises the credibility, the idea that "this could be true." It should therefore not hesitate to work on dialogue, work for a possible story that would have some interesting understood what the film claims type: energy channeled and not yet completely besotted youth. We have anyway on each side two very different starting assumptions:
The company Life Ranch : I just had a child, I feel the need to review a movie through my 20 years. Corporate soft, ambiguous in its intentions: fiction or documentary? Because it approximates a bad episode of Strip-Tease, with the false modesty that characterizes the words of the director, as if making a film was an act soft, improvised, which by a sort of alchemy was to produce this miracle energy.
The company Life Ranch : I just had a child, I feel the need to review a movie through my 20 years. Corporate soft, ambiguous in its intentions: fiction or documentary? Because it approximates a bad episode of Strip-Tease, with the false modesty that characterizes the words of the director, as if making a film was an act soft, improvised, which by a sort of alchemy was to produce this miracle energy.
Despite the many goals as reflected the Heartbeats all unified in this single aim pretty rare now, to make us experience an aesthetic in its simplicity and beauty respects and reveals a little piece of real . This question is to love imaginary that happens entirely in the mind of one who loves anything by interpreting them as signs of reciprocity. It is only to be understood as aesthetic support for the film: for it is on the lyric mode and sick that this love is lived, slow-motion strobe + interspersed with works by Michelangelo + Pass this is "the Knife, that's a lot but the reality sometimes seems to approach this kind of romantic frenzy, a beauty that I for one suffocating. Besides the sublimation takes only the time of the first part, the seduction, effusions. Dolan leaves quickly slowed proof is that some effects of the abuse he is accused are at every moment of the film.
Behind the current form too, and generational " fashion, "we are surprised to identify a story of desire behind these accoutrements pop, it eradicates the film a mythical skeleton (one sometimes gets the impression that the film is an adaptation to the letter of A Lover's Discourse: Fragments ) Xavier Dolan which, despite its fireworks games, not depart at any time.
Heartbeats sharing with Life at the Ranch and Lol (Juliette pointed out to me that it was the same structure between Life at the Ranch and Lol) same allocation of places, festivals and or concerts / campaign or part of disorientation, as if youth there was no pretense that this movement to live. But where the party is thought in Ranch Life in the eternal and positive as a stuttering Youth has nothing to say or to say, it is in the Heartbeats a way for the meeting for the reunion and for the gift: the gift we offer in thinking that making fun it becomes desirable. The festival is also the location of the ultimate revenge when the desire, strong desire, think and become another repeat successfully changing object, without understanding that the lack is more profound. But I will not leave the crap on almost habitual desire, and lack of love and that is perfectly voiced here about the film: http://spectresducinema.1fr1.net/conversations-autour-des-films- f1/les-amours-imaginaires-x-dolan-t619.htm
Heartbeats sharing with Life at the Ranch and Lol (Juliette pointed out to me that it was the same structure between Life at the Ranch and Lol) same allocation of places, festivals and or concerts / campaign or part of disorientation, as if youth there was no pretense that this movement to live. But where the party is thought in Ranch Life in the eternal and positive as a stuttering Youth has nothing to say or to say, it is in the Heartbeats a way for the meeting for the reunion and for the gift: the gift we offer in thinking that making fun it becomes desirable. The festival is also the location of the ultimate revenge when the desire, strong desire, think and become another repeat successfully changing object, without understanding that the lack is more profound. But I will not leave the crap on almost habitual desire, and lack of love and that is perfectly voiced here about the film: http://spectresducinema.1fr1.net/conversations-autour-des-films- f1/les-amours-imaginaires-x-dolan-t619.htm
For once the festival is not the place of the festive gathering and gregarious ( Life at the ranch), which can be unpleasant to look into everything he has euphoria and abandonment, but neglect the misanthrope side, facing you and his designs, celebration, that of unsocial sociability, that perfectly depicts the Heartbeats . The beauty
plastic film irritates many respects, I have already said, the ease of the process used by Dolan but also by the inevitable slope of emotion in which we are trained. Heartbeats could fall in renal clipesque be the frame excuses linking a series of aesthetic performance. Frame that would at least have the merit to exist contrary to the ranch life that the inadequacies of situations he returns: the more we find that friendly but behind the apparent topicality and freshness of the film persists boredom and poor, that we will not look at the cinema but we fled from there. I heard about the desire to fully restore the youthful cacophony: we've seen people talking all at once to the movies, Tati, Fellini this is not very new and it made sense. This disorder is accompanied by an auditory visual disorder where you do not know what to look between all that we do not want to look as if someone was missing in the foreground and the film was a sort of canvas background to customize.
Life Ranch prides itself on being a sort behaviorist approach, no psychologizing, where everything must be inferred, interpreted by the viewer: yes then this noise all the time still, is it the fear of emptiness ? Superficiality has already peaked in depth, but then I do not think so. I do not see where the fear in this film because I know it is possible to live like these girls live, always in the hollow of this heroic, never fear. They are nice and certainly smart, he's even one who felt compelled to say they do not live like that, "we read books too." I have no doubt they are as full as they are narcissistic and they believe in friendship. In short, the fear of emptiness is what could be said of many things when we fall into the over-interpretation.
In summary we have in both cases the same generation depicted on one side the totalizing ambition of the film is allowed only after it is admitted Disquiet working the body with its characters. The other, a film passed his immaturity, his lack of ambition and respect as the film's subject. Heartbeats is a speech that ripped the world and I consider post saving infinitely important and justified.
plastic film irritates many respects, I have already said, the ease of the process used by Dolan but also by the inevitable slope of emotion in which we are trained. Heartbeats could fall in renal clipesque be the frame excuses linking a series of aesthetic performance. Frame that would at least have the merit to exist contrary to the ranch life that the inadequacies of situations he returns: the more we find that friendly but behind the apparent topicality and freshness of the film persists boredom and poor, that we will not look at the cinema but we fled from there. I heard about the desire to fully restore the youthful cacophony: we've seen people talking all at once to the movies, Tati, Fellini this is not very new and it made sense. This disorder is accompanied by an auditory visual disorder where you do not know what to look between all that we do not want to look as if someone was missing in the foreground and the film was a sort of canvas background to customize.
Life Ranch prides itself on being a sort behaviorist approach, no psychologizing, where everything must be inferred, interpreted by the viewer: yes then this noise all the time still, is it the fear of emptiness ? Superficiality has already peaked in depth, but then I do not think so. I do not see where the fear in this film because I know it is possible to live like these girls live, always in the hollow of this heroic, never fear. They are nice and certainly smart, he's even one who felt compelled to say they do not live like that, "we read books too." I have no doubt they are as full as they are narcissistic and they believe in friendship. In short, the fear of emptiness is what could be said of many things when we fall into the over-interpretation.
In summary we have in both cases the same generation depicted on one side the totalizing ambition of the film is allowed only after it is admitted Disquiet working the body with its characters. The other, a film passed his immaturity, his lack of ambition and respect as the film's subject. Heartbeats is a speech that ripped the world and I consider post saving infinitely important and justified.
0 comments:
Post a Comment